An equal inheritance can place very different demands on each child’s finances.
A cottage can add to a child’s wealth while straining their household budget. Imagine three siblings inheriting equal shares: one lives nearby, one lives across the country, and the third cannot comfortably afford the upkeep.
For Serge Robichaud, a bilingual financial advisor based in Moncton, New Brunswick, the first question is whether each child would choose the responsibilities that come with the property.
What should parents ask before leaving a cottage to their children?
Serge Robichaud: Do they want to own it? Someone may love visiting every summer without wanting a permanent share of the bills and maintenance.
I would ask what each child would choose if offered a share of the cottage or cash of comparable value. The estate may not be able to offer that choice, but the answer helps separate loving a place from wanting to own it.
Children need room to answer honestly. Declining ownership should not be interpreted as rejecting the family or its memories.
How can a valuable inheritance strain a household’s finances?
Serge Robichaud: Suppose a cottage needs $18,000 a year for operating costs and a repair reserve. Divided equally among three owners, that is $6,000 each, or $500 a month. These figures are illustrative.
That payment might fit comfortably into one household’s budget while displacing another’s retirement savings. A major repair could also exceed the reserve. Who would cover the shortfall?
There is also the work involved. Who arranges repairs and handles emergencies? The nearby sibling should not automatically become the property manager. Equal ownership needs a practical agreement about money, use and responsibilities.
What if one child wants the cottage and the others would prefer money?
Serge Robichaud: One option is to leave the cottage to that child and use other assets or permanent life insurance proceeds to help balance the other children’s inheritances.
This is called estate equalization. It can help the child retain the property without financing a large payment to siblings. Parents could name the other children as insurance beneficiaries.
Coverage should reflect the intended inheritance for each child, taking other assets and relevant taxes into account. The will, beneficiary designations, and policy payout timing need to fit the planned transfer.
I would also assess insurability and whether premiums fit the parents’ retirement budget, allowing for their own future care.
What happens if the cottage’s value changes after the plan is set?
Serge Robichaud: I would review the cottage’s value alongside the assets or insurance intended for the other children. A fair balance today may look different ten years from now.
With a participating whole life policy, dividends can be used to buy paid-up additional insurance, increasing the death benefit over time.
That growth can help address a cottage’s appreciation. However, dividends are not guaranteed, and the policy benefit will not necessarily grow at the same pace as the property.
What if the children share ownership and someone wants out later?
Serge Robichaud: Agreeing on a property’s value does not establish that anyone can afford to buy the departing sibling’s share. I would ask where that money would come from. If the others cannot fund a buyout, would the family accept selling the cottage?
A lawyer can help with document arrangements for shared ownership and an eventual exit. Discussing this before someone urgently needs cash gives the family more time to consider its options.
A plan that assumes the wealthiest sibling will cover every shortfall needs a direct conversation with that person.
What about taxes when the cottage changes hands?
Serge Robichaud: A lifetime gift of capital property to adult children is generally treated as a sale at fair market value for tax purposes. A similar deemed sale generally occurs at death. Principal residence relief may apply if the cottage qualifies, and certain transfers to a spouse or common-law partner can defer tax.
Any resulting tax needs its own funding plan. Insurance payable directly to children to balance inheritances should not also be counted as money available to the estate to pay its tax bill.
Where should families start?
Serge Robichaud: Put the ownership costs beside each child’s household budget, then discuss who wants the property and how they would manage it. Consider the parents’ retirement and care needs before committing assets or premiums.
Shared ownership, one willing owner, or a sale may each make sense. The aim is an arrangement the family can afford and willingly maintain.
Before changing the will, find out whether the next owners would choose the arrangement you are planning to leave them.
You May Also Wish To Read
Op-Ed: Two hats, two salaries, one chair… conflict of interest?